Just found this site and thought you'd be interested, as it shows that we, as we are, more or less, existed a LONG time ago. I don't actually know if it disproves evolution, after all evolution, contrary to what many think, is just another theory, and theories need to be adjusted for accuracy sometimes. Nobody knows the truth we're all theorizing, and these finds do throw a monkey wrench, (no pun intended), in the current accepted works. It is possible that evolution did happen but just started much earlier, that the world is much older, that we are much older, that scientists are completely wrong about everything, etc. As I said, we know nothing, we're just guessing contrary to the scientists and "experts," who sincerely believe they know it all.
The good stuff starts about halfway down, so enjoy and maybe learn something.
Evolution Disproved Link to Web site
Here is one of the biggest shocks of this century. Are you
ready for it?
This man was applauded by a group of supporters in Australia
recently. Richard Dawkins is the world’s most famous living
“I challenge anyone to submit ‘out-of-sequence’ fossil finds
that disprove evolution,” he said. In his publication “The
Greatest Show on Earth” Dawkins issues this challenge four
And in the January issue of Investigate, his NZ follower
Warwick Don said “evolution would be falsified if even one
out of sequence fossil were ever found in the fossil record,
e.g. a fossil ‘human’ in the Carboniferous… No such
anachronistic fossils have ever been found.”
Richard and Don theorise that life forms evolved from simple
to complex, ending in man. But what if human remains were to
turn up in the “oldest” strata? Would that mean that man was
here at the beginning of life on earth?
WHAT A NUISANCE!
Oh bother! A fossil human skull has been found in
Carboniferous strata near Mahanoy City, Pennsylvania.
Specimens of this skull were taken by Chinese scientist Lin
Liangtai first to the geology department of National Taiwan
University. Then also, on March 28, 2008, this fossil was
scanned by the Computed Tomography system of Alberta Research
Council in Canada.
This fossil and more than 20 others from the same
Carboniferous strata have been thin sectioned and more than
1,000 microscopic pictures taken.
Examinations have been made not only through a stereo-
microscope, but also through a digital microscope, a
transmitted-light microscope and a scanning electron
ROCK OR FOSSIL?
Liangtai first asked, Is this A ROCK OR A FOSSIL?
The examining scientist noted, for a start, that its
computed-tomography images don’t look like any rock.
Images of the object show numerous remains of
(1) bone cells (osteocytes);
(2) branching blood vessel remains, Haversian canals and
(3) transverse section remains of blood vessels;
(4) red blood cells;
(5) degraded remains of neurons, neuroglial cells and
(6) muscle fibres;
(7) various fossilized tissues.
It contains fossilized nerve cells, dendrites and somas of
brain cells, that exist only in the central nervous system
and which are not found in any organ except in brains.
The remains point to a calvarium fossil that once contained
brain tissue. The blood vessels in the brain have carbonized
into shiny bituminous coal/anthracite.
No rocks or plants contain all at the same time the remains
of neurons, neuroglial cells, bone cells, red blood cells,
Haversian canals, osteons and blood vessels.
Pictures of the other Carboniferous fossils likewise show
Haversian canals and osteons, which are distinguishing
features of fossil bone micro-structures. They include organs
such as human liver, fingers, penises, testes, kidneys, limb,
ANIMAL OR HUMAN?
Liangtai’s next question was, Is this ANIMAL OR HUMAN?
All crania have different, distinctive shapes among different
orders of animal. Human skull caps have a unique shape from
mammalian skull caps.
The skull’s inner cavity has a capacity of 1,025 c.c.- 1,665
c.c. The No. 1 distinction of human skulls lies in their large
cranial capacity. No animal has a skull that remotely matches
human skulls in cranial capacity, cranial shape and cranial
The analysis shows that this subject fossil matches human
skull caps in cranial size, cranial capacity, and cranial
Thus, it can be identified as a human calvarium fossil by
forensic experts on human skulls. One such expert is Wilton
Krogman, who has physically examined the fossil and confirmed
it to be a human calvarium fossil.
ANCIENT OR MODERN?
Liangtai finally asked, Is it CARBONIFEROUS OR MODERN?
Portions of the fossil, including some of the fossil’s blood
vessels have turned into coal.
The skull was discovered near Mahanoy City between the coal
veins. The Pennsylvania state government’s geological unit
has confirmed in writing to Lin Liangtai that fossils found
near Mahanoy City are all 305 (+/- 7) million years old.
For over 27 years, the owner of the fossils, Ed Conrad, has
attested many times that all his fossils were found between
coal veins near Shenandoah and Mahanoy City, Pennsylvania.
That is in the anthracite region, the only one in the U.S.
proper. It’s a most-studied geological area of the
That is to say any animal fossil found there must have lived
there in the Carboniferous age.
I have addressed this issue at length with Ed Conrad, who for
27 years has battled the entrenched “experts” to come clean
about the discoveries.
Among Conrad’s other fossils are:
(a) a coalified axe handle as well-made as those sold
(b) a coalified piece of limb cut flatly across soft
flesh and hard bone, as if with a sharp knife, and
(c) a fossilized human finger complete with skin tissue,
finger nail, ligaments, and the middle phalanx.
Twenty medical experts have pronounced this as a genuine human
finger. This is not good news for the evolution theory.
But it gets worse…
HERE COME THE
Not only have numerous other human remains been discovered in
Carboniferous strata – such as a complete skeleton in
Carboniferous (Macoupin County, Illinois – The Geologist).
But also in EVERY other so-called geological age – for example
a human skeleton in Silurian rock (Franklin County, Missouri –
And tools, inscriptions and physical human remains in Cretaceous,
Triassic, Devonian, Ordovacian and Cambrian. Hundreds of
reports have appeared in Scientific American.
This is not about the age of the earth – an increasingly
debateable topic – but about the evolutionary succession-of-life
Even just one man found in the Carboniferous falsifies the
evolution theory. SO WHY DOES THIS EVOLUTION SCAM GO ON?
The truth is, many honest but misinformed scientists are caught
up in the system – while their mentors deliberately suppress
this information. After all, careers, reputations and funding
are at stake.
So, if the facts do not agree with the favoured theory, then
such facts, even an ‘imposing array’ of them, must be thrown
out of the window.
My hat is off to Lin Liangtai, who has confirmed that the
scientific elite are members of a pseudo establishment. Why?
Because they have not sought truth about man’s origin and
ancestry, but have gone along with a colossal lie to protect
their vested interests.
Surely this requires a no nonsense, “look in the mirror with
new honesty” approach. And when one who is honestly mistaken
hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease
to be honest.
A detailed report can be seen at
See also, with pictures:
BUT THERE'S MORE:
Now, I would like you to do something.
1. Email this newsletter to everyone you know.
2. Put it up onlone on Blogs – let everyone have it free.
3. Invite them to share it also.