Demonstrators characterized in same context as Al-Qaeda, Colombian FARC

Found this post at Activest Post    Link to Post Read it, even if not a demonstrator you should find it frightening as to the direction the governments of the "free world" are moving.  It seems that concentration camps are coming back, and not in Germany, well at least as far as I know right now. But they seem to be headed back in this country and in England, at least. President Hussein, ah err Obama, has already announced to us all that he can personally, or order, murder ANY US citizen, for no reason at all, just that he wants to. You all know I believe in reincarnation, is Hussein the current incarnation of Germany's former leader Adolf?  Lots of people thought that was G. Bush the 2nd. Maybe it wasn't, maybe he was just the loss leader, or maybe Hussein, ah errr Obama is the incarnation of Stalin?  If not one of the two, I'm sure they're having a good laugh at us.
In any case if he can freely murder me, or you or your wife, or your kids, or your grandchildren, are concentration, aka re-education, camps impossible? Not really...

Demonstrators characterized in same context as Al-Qaeda, Colombian FARC



Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet

Occupy London demonstrators have been listed as domestic terrorists by the City of London Police, who characterized them in the same context as Al-Qaeda, the Colombian FARC and Belarusian terrorists who bombed the Minsk underground.


“The City of London Police force was facing criticism last night after including the Occupy London demonstration in a letter warning businesses about potential terrorist threats,” reports the Independent.


Police admitted the leaflet, entitled, “Terrorism/Extremism Update,” was produced by them but claimed it was “poorly worded”.


“Activism is not a crime and the desire to participate in democratic decision-making should not be a cause for concern for the police in any free society,” said an Occupy London representative.


Previous advertising campaigns by other law enforcement bodies in London educated the public that behavior such as paying with cash, keeping curtains closed, or minding your own business were all signs of potential terrorism.


One radio commercial, produced by the The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), was later banned because it smeared law-abiding citizens and could “encourage people to harass or victimise their neighbours and was appealing to people’s fear.”


As we reported earlier, ‘Occupy’ demonstrators over the pond in Portland staged a march yesterday to protest the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act, which under Section 1031 could lead to demonstrators being carted off to detention camps and held without trial.


The Department of Defense is now training its personnel that protest amounts to “low-level terrorism” through tests that DoD staffers are required to take on a yearly basis.


Whether you agree with the grievances of the ‘Occupy’ movement or not, the fact that protest groups are now being designated as domestic terrorists underscores the fact that governments now treat dissent and the exercise of freedoms as a suspicious activity.


Yet weren’t we told the terrorists attacked us because they hate our freedoms? It appears as if the terrorists have won.